ferewm.blogg.se - Conveyance and property lawyer journal

The book will become the property of the reviewer on publication of the review. Please consult with the Book Review Editor if a longer review is desired. Book reviews should meet a guideline of 1,000 words.However, clear, concise submissions that fall outside these limits will be considered by the Casenotes Editor, and longer submissions may be appraised as articles. Casenotes should be between 2,000 – 4,000 words in length.This will be included within the issue contents. A summary in no more than 50 words should be included for all articles.However, longer articles may be considered for publication after consultation with the General Editor. In general, articles should be between 4000 – 8000 words.

We welcome the submission of articles for consideration by the General Editor with a view to publication.If you’re interested in firmwide or multiple user access to this title on Proview then please contact us directly to discuss what options are available. Purchase this title as an eBook to start reading today: Using ProView means you can connect to and interact with the content you rely on in new ways, wherever and whenever you like. Thomson Reuters ProView™ is custom built for legal professionals like you. Plus in-depth articles and publication reviewsĪlso available as an eBook on Thomson Reuters ProView™.The latest tax issues affecting property and conveyancing.

Precedents - changes in law and practice affecting drafting of conveyancing forms.

Conveyancer's Notebook - news of events and developments affecting property and conveyancing.

Considers what kind of a divesting intention would be sufficient to effect abandonment and the preferability of taking a different approach to abandonment of easements than to abandonment generally.The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer has long been recognised as the most authoritative journal specialising in the law and practice of conveyancing and allied topics. Considers what kind of a divesting intention would be sufficient to effect abandonment and the preferability of taking a different approach to abandonment of easements than to abandonment generally.ĪB - Comments on Annetts v Adeleye (CA) on whether abandonment of a right of way was effected by the conveyance of the dominant tenement subject to a covenant requiring the purchaser to fence the boundary between the dominant tenement and the access land. N2 - Comments on Annetts v Adeleye (CA) on whether abandonment of a right of way was effected by the conveyance of the dominant tenement subject to a covenant requiring the purchaser to fence the boundary between the dominant tenement and the access land. T1 - Abandoning "abandonment" for the implied release of easements: Annetts v Adeleye